Evaluation of Competencies TEC21

We would like to present the following information to help you understand our competency evaluation model.



ATENEA



In our Tec21 Model, the evaluation of subcompetencies is carried out through rubrics, which have four levels of achievement and specific descriptors, which allow the assessment of the evidence presented by students. The four levels of achievement are: outstanding, solid, basic, and incipient.



ATENEA

 

ATENEA

 

ATENEA

 

 

Rubricas
 

 

Perfil docente PrepaTec

 

 

We invite you to learn more about the evolution of the evaluation process through the resources and documents prepared by the Academic Vice-Rectorate and CEDDIE. In this section, you will find key information that will help you understand the changes, foundations, and tools that support this new stage

 

 

Banner evolución de la evaluación
Infografía
ELumen
CANVAS
 

 

ATENEA

 

Esquema




 

 

 

ATENEA



Get to know the support resources we have prepared to accompany you in each of the key stages of the sub-competence evaluation process for your Training Unit (UF). These materials are designed to provide you with practical guidance, clarity in evaluation criteria, and useful tools to facilitate documentation, reflection, and demonstration of your teaching performance.

Explore the available resources and make them part of your teaching development experience.



 



 

ATENEA



We share with you specific answers to the most common questions about the evolution of the evaluation. Check this section to better understand the changes and how they impact you.

 

EVOLUTION OF EVALUATION

¿What is the Evaluation Evolution that begins in Summer 2025?

 The Evaluation Evolution that begins in Summer 2025 is defined primarily by a distinction between Training Units. Starting this academic term, only certain Training Units will record in eLumen the level of achievement reached by students in each subcompetency.

This distinction does not imply changes to the Training Unit's evaluation plan. Instead, it represents a high-level shift related to each academic program's curricular pathway.

The Training Unit that registers the level of achievement of a subcompetency in eLumen represents milestones in the student’s curricular journey—moments where key graduation profile learnings are integrated and the full development of a competency is achieved. These Training Units will continue linking the evidence in Canvas with the institutional rubric for the relevant subcompetencies in eLumen.

Although only some Training Units will record achievement levels in eLumen, it is essential to emphasize that all Training Units continue to develop and assess subcompetencies and contribute to the graduation profile. Training Units that do not record the level of achievement in eLumen will conduct both the evaluation and feedback process exclusively in Canvas.

The following diagram summarizes the characteristics of the evaluation process starting in Summer 2025:

Esquema

When will the Evaluation Evolution begin?
This evolution will begin in Summer 2025 for all Training Units in the 2019 curricula.
How can I know whether my Training Unit evaluates and provides feedback on evidence in Canvas or eLumen?

There are several ways to identify the platform where you will evaluate evidence for your Training Unit (UF):

1. From Canvas: In the course corresponding to your UF, go to the Evaluation Plan section on the Home page. There you will find a note following the evidence section that indicates the platform used for evaluation:

     · If the UF evaluates in Canvas:

          ““Note: The evaluation and feedback of the evidence are carried out in Canvas.”

     · If the UF evaluates in eLumen:

          ““Note: Feedback on the evidence and the level of achievement for each subcompetency is provided in eLumen.”

These notes also appear at the beginning of each evidence item.

2. Through Atenea: Log in to Ateneaand search for your Training Unit (UF) using its course code. In the Indicator column, you can identify the type of UF based on the color:

     o Azul: Training Units that evaluate, provide feedback on evidence, and record the level of achievement in eLumen.

     o Purple: Training Units that evaluate and provide feedback on evidence in Canvas.

3. In the Training Unit Purpose Dashboard:Check the Dashboard Tablero de Propósito de UF. The last column, titled “Evaluation Platform,” specifies the platform for evaluating the evidence.

If my Training Unit indicates that evidence is evaluated in Canvas, does that mean I no longer develop or assess subcompetencies?

All Training Units will continue to develop and assess subcompetencies. The key difference is that, starting in Summer 2025, only some Training Units will record students' level of achievement in eLumen.

It is essential to understand and uphold the commitment that all Training Units must include integrative evidence in their evaluation plans to enable the assessment of the subcompetencies being developed.

Providing feedback on subcompetency performance in every Training Unit is crucial, as it helps students improve and prepare to demonstrate those sub-competencies in future Training Units, where the level of achievement will be officially recorded in eLumen.

Are subcompetency evidence items no longer required in Training Units that evaluate in Canvas?

Yes, they are still required. We continue to follow a competency-based educational model, meaning evidence remains essential.

These evidence items allow students to demonstrate subcompetencies through products or performances integrating knowledge, skills, and attitudes. Additionally, they form part of the final grade in the course.

How can I determine the numerical grade for evidence when evaluating in Canvas?

The numerical grade is determined using specific evaluation criteria for each piece of evidence, organized within an assessment instrument, such as a rubric, checklist, or observation guide.

Each criterion in the instrument is weighted, and a numerical score is assigned based on the student’s performance.

In addition to this evidence-specific instrument, the institutional rubric for the sub-competency must also be used. This rubric allows you to evaluate the level of achievement the student has reached for the sub-competency and remains a key reference in the assessment process.

Should I still use the institutional rubric to assess the evidence if my Training Unit is evaluated in Canvas?

Yes. Evidence is used to demonstrate subcompetencies; therefore, each institutional rubric should be used to assess the corresponding level of achievement.

Even if the level of achievement is not recorded in eLumen, the rubric must still be applied to guide the evaluation and provide meaningful feedback to the student.

In addition, it's essential to define specific evaluation criteria for each piece of evidence.

Keep in mind that providing feedback on subcompetency performance is essential. Feedback should be individualized, authentic, and meaningful, helping students understand their progress and areas for improvement.

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

How will students view the evaluation and feedback on their evidence?

· In Training Units that evaluate and provide feedback in Canvas, students will see the grade and feedback directly in the Canvas submission area where the evidence was uploaded.

· In Training Units that evaluate, provide feedback, and record subcompetency level of achievement in eLumen, students can view this information in their eLumen portfolio and through the MiTec platform.

Can a student receive an “Outstanding” level of achievement without progressing through the previous levels?

Yes. The subcompetency rubric evaluates the students’ demonstration of the subcompetency through the evidence presented in the Training Unit. Therefore, a student may achieve a Distinguished, Solid, Basic, or Incipient level, depending entirely on what is demonstrated through the evidence.

Institutional rubrics are aligned to sub-competencies, not to levels of mastery over time. As a result, the same rubric can be used at multiple points throughout the curricular journey. In each instance, the sub-competency is evaluated using the full achievement scale: Distinguished, Solid, Basic, and Incipient.

Where can I view the level of achievement obtained by my students in the Training Units that record achievement levels?

From MiTec, go to My Academic Role → My Tec21 → The Competencies I Develop.

You will find the Subcompetency Tracking Dashboard, where you can view the results by academic term and Training Unit.

Are the levels of achievement equivalent to mastery levels?
  • No, they are different concepts. The following chart provides a comparative overview:

    Esquema

    Mastery levels are different from levels of achievement; there is no equivalence between them. As we know, the learning objectives of each Training Unit (UF) include a set of subcompetencies defined at a specific mastery level. These mastery levels A, B, or C refer to the complexity and depth of the contexts or tasks in which students are expected to demonstrate mastery of a subcompetency.

    Mastery levels A, B, and C are defined in ascending order, with Level C representing the highest degree of complexity and depth. The evidence design for each Training Unit must take the assigned mastery level into account and define the appropriate characteristics, content, and difficulty level based on it.

    On the other hand, the four levels of achievement—Outstanding, Solid, Basic, and Incipient—refer to the performance quality demonstrated by the student for a given sub-competency.

What are the mastery levels?

The levels of mastery (A, B, and C) continue to be an element of the educational model as indicators of the level of complexity and depth in which the subcompetencies are developed. According to each program's curriculum, the Training Unit will continue to indicate the level of mastery expected for the subcompetencies that comprise it, and the design of the evidence must be based on the complexity and characteristics of the defined level of mastery. The level of mastery guides the Training Unit's design and, therefore, the evidence's design.

Continuous improvement of institutional rubrics.

During the assessment of your students' subcompetencies, have you identified areas for improvement in the rubrics? Now you can send us your proposal for improvement. To do so, we invite you to fill out the form at the following link

https://tec.rs/mejora-rúbricas

A committee will review the proposals to evaluate their incorporation in the next annual improvement cycle.



ATENEA